<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conflicted Libertarian &#187; Gerson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jindal2012blog.com/tag/gerson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jindal2012blog.com</link>
	<description>Jindal or Paul 2012?  Social Conservative or Libertarian?  Join me as I work through the contradictions and have a bit of fun, too!  Also an Evangelical Christian and sports fan!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>INTRIGUING COMMENTARY ARTICLE</title>
		<link>http://jindal2012blog.com/intriguing-commentary-article/</link>
		<comments>http://jindal2012blog.com/intriguing-commentary-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elwood Earl &#34;Sandy&#34; Sanders, Jr.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 U.S. Presidential Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel-Patrick-Moynihan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael-Gerson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch-Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter-Wehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican-Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jindal2012blog.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Assistant Blogger has been involved with the recent Virginia special session on the Melendez-Diaz decision requiring lab analysts to be brought to court in criminal cases.  (To see those articles go to www.varight.com and click on the &#8220;Sandy Sanders&#8221; tag.)  I also have enjoyed the quiet August days.  But there is a great article [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Assistant Blogger has been involved with the recent Virginia special session on the Melendez-Diaz decision requiring lab analysts to be brought to court in criminal cases.  (To see those articles go to <a href="http://www.varight.com">www.varight.com</a> and click on the &#8220;Sandy Sanders&#8221; tag.)  I also have enjoyed the quiet August days.  But there is a <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/special-preview--the-path-to-republican-revival-15212">great article </a> in Commentary that speaks highly of why Governor Jindal would be a great candidate. </p>
<p>The article by Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson examines the GOP fall and institutional reasons why Democrats have some advantages: </p>
<blockquote><p>Over the past five presidential elections, Brownstein writes, Democrats have built a “blue wall” consisting of 18 states and the District of Columbia; these account for fully 90 percent of the electoral votes needed to win the presidency.</p></blockquote>
<p>The solution is to turn to innovative new leaders (emphasis added):</p>
<blockquote><p>As it happens, the GOP has successful reformers to whom it can look to and learn from, including popular governors or former governors like Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty, <em>Bobby Jindal</em>, and Jeb Bush.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wehner and Gerson also discuss the issue of immigration: </p>
<blockquote><p>No national party can hope to succeed in the long run without broad support among immigrants and the children of immigrants—particularly, these days, Hispanics and Asian Americans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Governor Jindal&#8217;s immigrant, Asian-American background and record of accomplishment will be attractive to many people, without sacrificing his staunch conservatism.  Wehner and Gerson restate the point:</p>
<blockquote><p>To succeed, the Republican argument requires communicating that growing ethnic diversity does not undermine but rather strengthens the American ideal.</p></blockquote>
<p>This Governor Jindal can do.  He also has stated (in that infamous speech that nobody liked but me!) that government tends to stifle innovation and drive.  Wehner and Gerson agree this issue is crucial for Republicans:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is, in, fact, vital for Republican leaders to press the case for economic growth in general. Americans achieve their dreams not through the redistribution of wealth but through the creation of wealth.</p></blockquote>
<p>Governor Jindal can speak to another issue important to Wehner and Gerson &#8211; social justice:</p>
<blockquote><p>In this respect, Republicans would be well advised here to borrow a page from David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith in their revival of the British Conservative party. These leaders have emphasized a range of issues that directly influence the quality of life in community: homelessness, addiction, prison reform, family breakdown, long-term unemployment.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would suggest that as Governor of Louisiana, Jindal has made major changes that will improve the quality of life:  Ethics reform, encouragement of businesses to come to the state, prison reform, tax reform.  Jindal helped bring back a chicken processing plant to Monroe.  Even less obvious issues like speed traps are part of this new thinking.  Of course Louisiana has to be concerned about weather-related preparedness.  I think we&#8217;ll see more innovation. </p>
<p>Finally, Wehner and Gerson speak of returning the GOP to what Senator Moynihan called a &#8220;party of ideas.&#8221; </p>
<blockquote><p>In the 1980s, one of the Republican party’s main sources of attraction to younger conservatives—we are thinking of our younger selves, among legions of others—was its growing reputation for intellectual vitality. “Of a sudden,” wrote Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a Democrat, in 1981, “the GOP has become a party of ideas.” Restoring that reputation, to be earned now as then through carefully argued and compellingly articulated programs of reform, is a central challenge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Governor Jindal clearly has the intellectual capital to enage that debate.  He can shape the debate on many issues.  I believe that he will be a great candidate and if elected a great President &#8211; whether in 2012 or beyond. </p>
<p>Finally, there are other leaders with ideas in the Republican Party.  Gov. Mitch Daniels has a stellar record in Indiana and Governor Pawlenty likewise in Minnesota (a blue state that can and does elect conservatives).  Former Governors Huckabee and Romney have must to admire.  Sarah Palin has been vilified in the press but she can be a spark for the party and cna connect with ordinary people &#8211; the exact reason so many liberals are afraid of her.  There are others in Congress and state houses with new ideas.   Finally, Congressman Ron Paul, my other political hero, has changed the field of play for ideas and expanded the GOP&#8217;s potential reach. </p>
<p>Having said that, I still believe that Governor Jindal may be the answer to a party looking for new ideas and a new package attractive to Republicans, many independents and conservative Democrats.  Keep an eye on Louisiana.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote><p> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jindal2012blog.com/intriguing-commentary-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
